Meetings & Events:
(go back to list of meetings & events page)
March 14 2006 – Reversing the Blame Culture: Can the NHS Learn From the Experience of Other Industries?
Overview
Chief Medical Officer Liam Donaldson has said that in the developed
world, the risk of being killed in hospital as a result of a medical error was
1 in 300, compared with 1 in 10 million chance of being killed in an air accident.
The aviation industry has learnt the hard way and has redesigned systems and
educated teams that rely on each other with safety as the core focus.

The APPG on Patient Safety facilitated a discussion around the concept that
healthcare now needs to learn, using the example of the aviation industry, how
a system of reporting errors in which medical practitioners are not worried
about unreasonable consequences, will lead to improved patient safety. This
meeting provided an opportunity to discuss the experience of the aviation industry
and how healthcare can be redesigned so that it is flexible enough to absorb
human error and improve patient safety. The meeting also explored how we can
lessen the blame culture and make safety recommendations intended to prevent
the recurrence of adverse patient safety incidents.
Speakers were:
Dr Howard Stoate MP, Chair of the group, opened the meeting
by stressing that the safety practices adopted by other industries is something
that healthcare needs to consider in order to foster improved patient safety.
He hoped that the following discussion would facilitate further debate around
this issue, whilst providing a useful insight into how other industries, such
as aviation have approached the issue of safety.
Captain Jock Lowe, aviation consultant and former Chief Pilot at British Airways,
explained that the safety practices adopted in the aviation industry could be
applied to changing the “blame’’ culture that exists in healthcare
and subsequently improve patient safety. Captain Lowe suggested that it was
necessary for the healthcare industry to ‘”recognise and accept
that the issue of safety is an integral part of good customer service.’’
He went on to state that patient safety could be achieved by appointing a single
regulator across the industry, holding organisations to account and regularly
ensuring that individuals are fit to practice. Unlike the aviation industry,
Captain Lowe believed that there were too many regulatory bodies operating in
healthcare, creating complications and reducing the clarity of safe practice.
Every six months pilots have to prove their competency to fly to the aviation
regulator. Captain Lowe suggested that a similar process might want to be considered
for those working with patients in healthcare.
Rather than placing sole responsibility for safety on specific individuals,
the aviation industry has created a culture that encourages teamwork and shared
responsibility for when things go wrong. Through confidential reporting, individuals
are encouraged to report safety violations. This has increased the reporting
of dangerous incidents, allowing an analysis of what has gone wrong and how
such situations can be avoided in the future, without individuals fearing severe
repercussions. This has moved the aviation industry away from blame directed
at individuals to a culture of shared responsibility.
Professor James Reason, Professor Emeritus at the University of Manchester,
built on the comments made by Captain Lowe by stating that a safer culture for
patients can be “engineered” within healthcare, by adopting a team
based approach to safety throughout the industry.
However, Professor Reason argued that creating a totally ‘‘blame
free culture’’ in healthcare was impossible. Individuals still need
to be held responsible for the safety of their patients, especially in the context
of preventing criminal cases of patient abuse.
Professor Reason accepted that the aviation industry had made huge strides in
improving passenger safety and that ensuring healthcare staff to report safety
violations more readily was necessary. However, it is also important he said,
to recognise that the two are completely different industries and that a ‘‘line
has to be drawn between what is and what is not possible within healthcare.’’
The nature of delivering a service in healthcare is more diverse and personal
than in the aviation industry.
Sue Osborn, Joint Chief Executive of the NPSA, agreed that huge lessons can
be and already have been learnt from other ‘’safety conscious industries.’’
However, Ms Osborn also echoed the comments made by Professor Reason, stating
that the concept of ‘’no blame’’ is not acceptable in
the healthcare industry.
Ms Osborn argued that individuals working within healthcare need to be accountable,
as a minority of individuals do not adhere to the rules surrounding patient
safety, yet she recognised that systems for dealing with individuals who put
patients’ safety at risk need to be consistent and transparent. Ms Osborn
stated that reporting systems have been successfully implemented in certain
areas of the industry, but conceded that more needs to be done in the area of
primary care.
By moving away from ‘’knee-jerk’’ reactions in disciplining
healthcare staff, reducing the authority to suspend within the industry and
recognising the past injustices that have been occurred by staff within health
services, Ms Osborn argued that a culture can be developed in which organisations
gain a ‘’memory’’ and where staff can learn and gain
a greater understanding from when things go wrong.
Lastly, Professor Sir Graeme Catto, President of the GMC endorsed a move towards
a ‘’collective consciousness’’ within the industry where
staff work more closely as a team to improve patient safety as a collective
goal. The concept of people feeling that they can actively come forward to report
safety issues needs to be encouraged.
Professor Catto said that it was important for individuals to regulate themselves
and accept personal responsibility for their actions, but that it is also necessary
for people to receive greater support through team working. He also recognised
that healthcare staff should be ‘’fit to practice’’
and suggested that doctors, like pilots, should have licenses that are not finite
and instead subject to renewal.
This discussion was followed by a Q&A session between the panel and attendees.